Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Jewelry Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 17, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMislabeled Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnlabeled Dropdown MenusUnannounced Pop-up Windows

Case Summary

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually impaired individual, has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online luxury jewelry retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on August 17, 2022. Represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., the plaintiff alleges that the defendant's e-commerce platform is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers.

The complaint specifically details several access barriers, including mislabeled product images that announce links instead of descriptions, rendering them incomprehensible to screen-reader users. Additionally, the store locator page on the e-commerce website lacks a "Find my Location" feature and fails to announce store addresses, only providing phone numbers. Menu drop-down options are not properly labeled for screen-reader integration, often announcing "blank" for features like size selection. Furthermore, when a user clicks "Add to Bag," a pop-up window appears but is not announced, preventing the plaintiff from knowing if the item was added or how to proceed to checkout.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers whose digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III requirements for web accessibility. Businesses operating e-commerce sites that serve as extensions of their physical stores must ensure their digital interfaces are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, providing effective communication and equal access to goods and services to avoid similar litigation and potential injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury jewelry retailer accused of?

The online luxury jewelry retailer is accused of having product images with mislabeled alt text that announce links instead of descriptions, a store locator page that lacks a "Find my Location" feature and fails to announce store addresses, unlabeled menu drop-down options that announce "blank" to screen readers, and unannounced pop-up windows for actions like "Add to Bag" that prevent users from understanding if an item was added or how to check out.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities under ADA Title III. Such failures can lead to lawsuits seeking permanent injunctive relief, requiring significant modifications to digital platforms, and potentially resulting in awards for attorney's fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Jewelry Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer