Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Watch Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 19, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text (Image Links)Keyboard Navigation Failure (Focus/Skip Link)Dynamic Content Announcement FailureScreen Reader Incompatibility (Checkout)

Case Summary

Raymond T. Mahlberg has filed a lawsuit on August 19, 2022, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, against an online watch retailer. The plaintiff, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual, alleges that the e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to him, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations, including product images mislabeled with HTTP links instead of descriptive alternative text, a 'Store' page that lacks proper focus on addresses and skips essential information, and a 'Skip to Main Content' feature that bypasses the primary content to go directly to an email subscription. Furthermore, the 'Add to Bag' function displays a new window without announcing it to screen-reader users, hindering the plaintiff's ability to confirm purchases or proceed to checkout. These barriers impede the functionality of screen-reading software, denying Raymond T. Mahlberg full and equal access to the digital platform and its associated services.

This litigation underscores the increasing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with ADA Title III and web accessibility standards. Companies in similar industries must ensure their digital platforms are designed, maintained, and operated to be fully and equally accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to provide effective communication and auxiliary aids can result in demands for permanent injunctive relief, as well as an award of attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online watch retailer accused of?

The online watch retailer is accused of product images mislabeled with HTTP links instead of descriptive text, a 'Store' page with no focus on addresses, a 'Skip to Main Content' feature that bypasses critical information, and an 'Add to Bag' function that fails to announce when items are added to the cart.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal imperative for businesses to ensure their e-commerce websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities under ADA Title III, warning of potential demands for injunctive relief and legal costs for non-compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Watch Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer