ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Electrical and Lighting Supplier
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on October 6, 2022, against an online electrical and lighting supplier.
The complaint alleges several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home page button/company logo, a mislabeled slideshow with no other description, unlabeled filters (Brand, Finish, Material, Number of Lights, Room Style, Type) not integrating with screen readers, inaccessible item prices, and an unlabeled notification for items added to the shopping cart. These barriers prevent visually disabled users from fully accessing and utilizing the e-commerce website.
This legal action highlights the ongoing risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that do not comply with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher. Companies in similar industries must proactively audit and remediate their digital platforms to ensure full and equal access for all users, thereby mitigating potential lawsuits and legal liabilities related to digital accessibility.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online electrical and lighting supplier accused of?
The complaint alleges violations including a mislabeled home page button/company logo, a mislabeled slideshow without descriptions, unlabeled filters, inaccessible item prices, and an unlabeled shopping cart notification.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
What legal risk does this create?
This case illustrates the significant legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees under the AD