Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Mobile Website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 21, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 Level AWCAG 2.1 Level AANon-Text Content ViolationMissing Column HeadersFocus Order IssuesImages of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed a lawsuit against a restaurant operating in Florida, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on December 21, 2022. The complaint alleges that the restaurant's mobile website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, uses Apple Screen Reader VoiceOver software to access digital content and acts as a "tester" for civil rights compliance.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to unlabeled promotional images with unannounced details; Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) because a 'Nutrition Information' PDF table lacks identified column headers; Guideline 1.3.3 (Sensory Characteristics) as PDF content is announced only as "image"; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) where menu content does not receive focus and is skipped; and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) because text within images, like the 'Freaky Friday' promotion, is not announced and inaccessible to screen readers.

This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for businesses, particularly restaurants and other places of public accommodation, that maintain inaccessible mobile websites or digital platforms. The complaint emphasizes that pre-existing ADA obligations cannot be avoided through contractual arrangements with third-party vendors for features like reservations or online stores. Businesses are therefore mandated to ensure their digital offerings, including those provided by third parties, are fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to prevent discrimination against individuals with disabilities and avoid similar legal challenges.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant mobile website accused of?

The mobile website is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Guidelines 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unlabeled images, 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for PDF tables without column headers, 1.3.3 (Sensory Characteristics) for unannounced PDF text, 2.4.3 (Focus order) for skipped menu content, and 1.4.5 (Images of Text) for unreadable text in images.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the civil rights law office of J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for businesses whose mobile websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users, emphasizing that ADA Title III compliance extends to digital platforms and third-party vendor integrations, requiring constant monitoring and maintenance to prevent discrimination.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Mobile Website. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer