Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a sporting goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 30, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Mislabeled UI ElementsInaccessible Text ContentScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureWCAG 2.0 AA Compliance

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit on December 30, 2022, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against an online sporting goods retailer.

The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers preventing blind and visually disabled users from full and equal access. Specific violations include mislabeled icons in the upper right-hand corner, a mislabeled popup window offering discounts, mislabeled quantity increase/decrease buttons, inaccessible text (such as payment information), and inaccessible product prices. Furthermore, the website's accessibility statement and widget were found to be ineffective, and the platform reportedly fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This action highlights the continuous legal imperative for businesses operating digital platforms with a nexus to physical establishments to ensure their websites are fully compliant with ADA Title III. Failure to implement effective accessibility measures can result in ongoing litigation and demands for comprehensive injunctive relief, underscoring the necessity of proactive web accessibility adherence.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this sporting goods retailer accused of?

The retailer's website is accused of having mislabeled icons and popup windows, mislabeled quantity buttons, inaccessible text for payment information, and inaccessible product prices. The site's accessibility statement and widget were also found to be ineffective.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for online businesses that operate in conjunction with physical stores, highlighting the necessity of designing websites to be fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities to comply with ADA Title III and avoid similar litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a sporting goods retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer