Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fashion Footwear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 4, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Management Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on January 4, 2023, against an online fashion footwear retailer. The plaintiff, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers.

The complaint specifically outlines several accessibility barriers encountered by the plaintiff, including product images that are mislabeled with links or numbers instead of descriptive text, making them incomprehensible to screen-reader users. Additionally, on the "Find a Store" page, address and hours information is skipped due to a lack of focus and screen reader incompatibility. The plaintiff also reported that on the sneaker purchase page, the price is not announced, and size options cannot be changed or searched using a keyboard, preventing the completion of a purchase.

This lawsuit highlights the legal vulnerability of businesses, particularly those operating both physical stores and e-commerce platforms, under ADA Title III. Failure to design, build, and maintain websites that are fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments, ensuring compatibility with screen-reading software, can lead to claims for permanent injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs. Such cases underscore the necessity for all public accommodations to provide effective communication and equal access to their digital services.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe retailer accused of?

The online shoe retailer is accused of product images being mislabeled with links instead of descriptive text, "Find a Store" page content (address and hours) being skipped by screen readers due to focus issues, and the inability to complete purchases on product pages because prices are not announced and sizes cannot be changed or searched via keyboard.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that e-commerce businesses, especially those with physical locations, face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to demands for injunctive relief and covering legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fashion Footwear Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer