Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 12, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader Annoucement IssuesDuplicate IDs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the Southern District of Florida on January 12, 2023. The complaint, filed by Acacia Barros, P.A., alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired users, including the plaintiff, who relies on screen-reading software to access web content.

The lawsuit details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations. These include mislabeled product images or missing image descriptions, preventing the plaintiff from understanding products and completing purchases. Additionally, prices are not announced due to a lack of "focus" on product pages, and pop-up windows (e.g., for "Add to Bag") are not announced to screen readers. The "Store Locator" page fails to announce store addresses, skipping directly to phone numbers. Further issues include clickable controls that are only mouse-accessible, violating WCAG 2.1 A F15, and the presence of duplicate IDs on elements, violating WCAG 2.1 A 4.1.1.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. Similar online retailers are at risk of litigation if their websites do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to demands for permanent injunctive relief, costly website modifications, and the payment of attorney's fees to ensure effective communication and equal enjoyment of services for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of mislabeled or missing image descriptions for products, unannounced prices on product pages, unannounced pop-up windows when adding items to a bag, store locator pages skipping addresses, clickable controls only accessible by mouse (WCAG 2.1 A F15), and duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.1 A 4.1.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually-impaired individual, filed this lawsuit. He is represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for other online retailers whose websites are not fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Businesses may face lawsuits under ADA Title III, requiring costly modifications, injunctive relief, and payment of attorney's fees to ensure compliance with web accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Fashion Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer