Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Bar Operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 27, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text ContentWCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)WCAG 1.4.5 Images of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff James Watson has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a restaurant and bar operator in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 27, 2023. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, thereby violating federal accessibility standards.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include Guideline 1.1.1 for Non-Text Content, where image-based happy hour pricing and event details lack announced text alternatives. Guideline 1.3.2 on Meaningful Sequence is violated as visually impaired users cannot access pricing and timing information within promotional images. Further issues involve Guideline 2.4.3 regarding Focus Order, as the main menu button does not receive focus, skipping instead to the logo. Guideline 2.4.4, Link Purpose (In Context), is violated because users are not notified when reservation links open in new browser windows. Finally, Guideline 1.4.5, Images of Text, is cited for promotional information presented solely as images without accessible text alternatives, making content like weekend brunch details and event information inaccessible.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for restaurants, bars, and similar public accommodations that offer digital platforms. Such businesses must ensure their websites and mobile applications are fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guidelines to avoid discrimination claims. The lawsuit underscores the importance of effective communication through auxiliary aids and services for disabled users, irrespective of whether inaccessible elements are managed by third-party vendors.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant and bar operator accused of?

The restaurant and bar operator is accused of violating WCAG Guidelines including 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content), 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence), 2.4.3 (Focus Order), 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context), and 1.4.5 (Images of Text). These violations make the mobile website inaccessible to visually impaired users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

James Watson filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that businesses operating digital platforms, like restaurant mobile websites, face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their online services are not fully accessible to disabled individuals. Compliance with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guidelines is crucial to avoid similar discrimination claims, even for elements managed by third parties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Bar Operat.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer