Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry and Toy Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 14, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Checkout ProcessFocus Management

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online jewelry and toy retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 14, 2023. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, alleging that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG violations, including duplicate IDs with the same label on multiple images, preventing screen readers from announcing prices. The "Locate a Store" page is inaccessible, only announcing "get directions" and skipping the address. Banners and images lack alt-text descriptions, instead announcing the HTTP link where the image is hosted. Furthermore, when attempting to add items to a bag, the checkout pop-up window is not announced and lacks focus, preventing screen readers from completing the purchase.

This lawsuit highlights the legal imperative for online businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites that serve as extensions of physical stores, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III. Businesses in similar industries face significant legal risk if their websites do not provide effective communication and equal access for individuals with visual disabilities who rely on screen-reading software.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry and toy retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of duplicate IDs on images without price announcements, an inaccessible "Locate a Store" page that skips addresses, missing alt-text descriptions on banners and images, and an unreadable checkout pop-up window for screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen and is represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores that online businesses that operate e-commerce websites serving as extensions of physical stores face legal liability under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with visual disabilities using screen-reading software.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry and Toy.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer