Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 23, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A F65WCAG 2.1 AH71Mislabeled Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnannounced Dynamic Content

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on February 23, 2023. Represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., the visually-impaired plaintiff alleges that the fashion retailer's website is inaccessible to blind users.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including mislabeled product images where some images link to HTTP instead of descriptions (WCAG 2.1 A F65), and multiple images on product pages announcing generically as 'product image button' or having identical IDs (WCAG 2.1 AH71). Additionally, dynamic content, such as 'added to bag' pop-ups during online purchases, is not announced by screen readers, preventing the plaintiff from knowing checkout readiness. Furthermore, essential information like store addresses and phone numbers on the store locator page is skipped by screen readers, rendering it inaccessible.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal exposure for online retailers whose digital platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Businesses operating e-commerce websites and physical stores under ADA Title III must ensure their online presence provides effective communication and equal access, or risk similar litigation for failing to meet accessibility standards.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

Mislabeled product images (some linking to HTTP, others with generic 'product image button' announcements or duplicate IDs), unannounced dynamic content (like 'added to bag' pop-ups), and inaccessible store location details where addresses and phone numbers are skipped by screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

Businesses operating e-commerce websites that are not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals face increased legal risk under ADA Title III, including potential injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs for failing to provide equal access and effective communication.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer