Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a convenience store chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 1, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesForm Labeling IssuesMissing Text AlternativesKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a major convenience store chain in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 1, 2023. The complaint alleges that the convenience store chain's website contains accessibility barriers preventing visually impaired users from full and equal access to its goods, services, and information, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The alleged WCAG violations include insufficient descriptions for product sizing and color options, mislabeled site functions such as quantity adjustment buttons (labeled as "plus sign/hyphen"), shopping cart information (price, discount, subtotal) that is not properly labeled for screen reader integration, and a mislabeled homepage logo where the screen reader fails to convey its purpose. These barriers purportedly hinder effective communication and navigation for visually disabled individuals.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risk for e-commerce websites and digital platforms, particularly those linked to physical public accommodations, that fail to adhere to ADA Title III requirements and WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines. Businesses with similar online offerings must ensure their digital presence is fully accessible to disabled users to avoid potential litigation and ensure compliance with federal disability laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this convenience store chain accused of?

The convenience store chain is accused of having a website with insufficient product sizing descriptions, no descriptions for color options, mislabeled quantity adjustment buttons (e.g., "plus sign/hyphen"), improperly labeled shopping cart details (price, discount, subtotal), and a mislabeled homepage logo that doesn't convey its function to screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firms represent the plaintiff?

NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit. He is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This lawsuit demonstrates that businesses operating convenience store chains, especially those with e-commerce websites integrated with physical locations, face significant legal risks under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, requiring them to make proactive modifications.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a convenience store chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer