ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Restaurant Chain
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit against an online restaurant chain in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 15, 2023.
The complaint alleges various WCAG violations including mislabeled text throughout the website leading to cursor skips, a telephone number lacking a full description, mislabeled carousel images, and screen reader freezing when attempting to choose delivery or pickup times. Additionally, the website's "accessibility" statement was ineffective and inaccessible, and the platform failed to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Level AA or higher.
This legal action underscores the critical need for online businesses, especially those in the restaurant sector with reservation and ordering capabilities, to ensure their digital presence is fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III to mitigate potential legal liabilities.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant chain accused of?
The lawsuit alleges mislabeled text leading to navigation issues, a telephone number without a full description, mislabeled carousel images, screen reader freezing during delivery/pickup time selection, and an ineffective "accessibility" statement, all contributing to a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firms?
VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case highlights the significant legal exposure for online businesses, particularly restaurant groups, whose websites are not fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to costly accessibility lawsuits and mandated remediation.