Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 27, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Form LabelsIncorrect State Announcements

Case Summary

James Watson has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online clothing retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on December 27, 2023. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible, thereby denying visually impaired consumers equal enjoyment of its goods and services.

The complaint specifies several WCAG violations, including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to unannounced table headers and redundant descriptions in size guides; Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) as pop-ups are not announced and do not receive focus; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) where a cookie dialog is not announced; Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for an unlabeled 'Pay with Apple Pay' button; and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) because unavailable product size buttons are not correctly announced to screen reader users.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with digital accessibility standards. Companies in the retail sector, particularly those with a significant online presence, must ensure their platforms are usable by individuals with disabilities to avoid similar lawsuits and potential liabilities for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to unannounced table labels and excessive descriptions; Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) because popups are not announced and do not receive focus; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) as a cookie dialog is not announced and focus is misplaced; Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for an unlabeled 'Pay with Apple Pay' button; and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) because unavailable product size buttons are not properly announced to screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

James Watson filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online retailers whose websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III. Businesses could face injunctions requiring website modifications, as well as liability for attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer