Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 9, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityColor Contrast IssuesZoom Functionality Missing

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit on January 9, 2024, in the Southern District of Florida against a prominent fast-food chain. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce platform violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, a visually impaired and legally blind individual, relies on screen-reading software to access online content.

The lawsuit claims that the fast-food chain's website contains several accessibility barriers preventing effective use by screen-reader software. These include issues with finding locations due to skipped addresses and lack of focus, unreadable banners without meaningful descriptions, images lacking text descriptions (alt text), and a lack of announcement when items are added to the cart or where the checkout button is located. Additionally, items in the "Bag" for checkout are not announced, and the site exhibits poor contrast with no zoom feature, impeding full and equal access for visually impaired users.

This complaint underscores the critical importance for online food ordering services and other public accommodations to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses operating websites that serve as points of sale or provide essential information, particularly those with a nexus to physical locations, face significant legal risks if their online content is not equally accessible to all users, including those with visual impairments.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fast-food chain accused of?

The fast-food chain is accused of having a website that skips addresses and lacks focus for location selection, features unreadable banners without meaningful descriptions, displays images without alt text, fails to announce when items are added to the cart or where the checkout button is, does not announce items in the checkout "Bag," and presents poor contrast without a zoom feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually impaired veteran, filed this lawsuit. He is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for any business operating an e-commerce website that serves as a public accommodation. Failure to provide a fully accessible digital platform, especially one that directly impacts access to goods and services available at physical locations, can lead to ADA Title III litigation and demands for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer