Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Steakhouse Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 21, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Document FormatWCAG 2.1 Level A

Case Summary

Aishia Petersen has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against a steakhouse chain in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 21, 2024. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses screen-reading software, alleges that the digital platform of the business is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby denying full and equal enjoyment of goods and services.

The complaint details numerous Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including the inability of screen readers to announce restaurant addresses and phone numbers, unannounced banners, missing alternative text for images, skipped links due to lack of focus, and inaccessible PDF menus. Further allegations state that the "order now" feature is confusing with incorrect pricing, the website fails to meet WCAG 2.1 Level A accessibility standards, lacks keyboard-only navigability, has inaccessible "Add to Cart" and "Checkout" features, fails to announce form error messages, and includes buttons without proper roles or screen reader accessibility.

This case highlights the significant legal risks for online businesses, including other restaurant chains, if their digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to costly litigation, including demands for injunctive relief to remediate website accessibility barriers and liability for attorneys' fees and costs, underscoring the critical importance of comprehensive digital accessibility.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

The complaint alleges numerous WCAG violations, including lack of screen reader announcements for restaurant information, unannounced banners, missing alternative text for images, inaccessible links, inaccessible PDF menus, confusing ordering processes, failure to meet WCAG 2.1 Level A, lack of keyboard-only navigation, inaccessible "Add to Cart" and "Checkout" features, unannounced form error messages, and non-accessible buttons for screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case signifies a legal risk for other online restaurant services that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Such businesses may face similar ADA Title III lawsuits, leading to court-ordered injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers and potential liability for attorneys' fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Steakhouse Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer