Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a sports grill chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 7, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level AAScreen Reader AccessibilityKeyboard NavigationInsufficient Color ContrastForm Error Identification

Case Summary

Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a Florida-based sports grill chain in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 7, 2024.

The complaint alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations impacting screen reader users. These include issues with meaningful sequence (1.3.2) and focus order (2.4.3) related to various modal pop-ups, such as a GDPR modal, Credit Card Information modal, and Choose a Restaurant modal. Additionally, the lawsuit cites insufficient contrast (1.4.3) for content obscured by modals, lack of error identification (3.3.1) for missing input in search, add-to-cart, and redemption fields, and inadequate labels or instructions (3.3.2) for checkout fields.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating digital platforms that fail to provide accessible experiences for visually impaired users. It underscores the necessity for all online public accommodations to ensure full WCAG compliance to avoid similar legal challenges and to provide equal access to goods and services for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online sports grill accused of?

The lawsuit alleges violations including WCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, 2.4.3 Focus Order, 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), 3.3.1 Error Identification, and 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, primarily impacting the functionality of pop-up modals, form fields, and content visibility for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm is representing them?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create for other online food service providers?

This lawsuit demonstrates the significant legal exposure for online food service providers and similar digital public accommodations that do not adhere to WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees for accessibility barriers.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a sports grill chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer