Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Automotive Parts and Services Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 28, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A/AA Keyboard Focus OrderWCAG 2.1 A/AA Missing LabelsWCAG 2.1 AA Color ContrastWCAG 2.1 A/AA Moving Content ControlsWCAG 2.1 A/AA Image Text Accessibility

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera has filed a federal lawsuit against an online automotive parts and services retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 28, 2024. The complaint, Document 1 in Case 1:24-cv-21171-PCH, alleges that the e-commerce website maintains access barriers that prevent visually disabled individuals, including Mr. Herrera, from fully and equally accessing its content and services in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with keyboard focus order (Guideline 1.3.2 and 2.4.3) where interactive elements like a 'Continue' button and promotional pop-ups did not receive proper focus or announcement. Other alleged violations involve a lack of keyboard accessibility (Guideline 2.1.1) due to unannounced submenus, missing controls for moving content on an automatically rotating carousel (Guideline 2.2.2), and unclear link purposes (Guideline 2.4.4) where image links were announced by their source file names. The lawsuit also identifies insufficient contrast ratios (Guideline 1.4.3), unlabeled images of text (Guideline 1.4.5), invisible focus indicators (Guideline 2.4.7), and unannounced labels for form fields (Guideline 3.3.2), all of which impede screen reader functionality.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating public-facing websites that fail to adhere to established accessibility standards. Organizations within the retail and service sectors that rely on digital platforms for customer engagement, transactions, and information dissemination must proactively ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face potential litigation and costly remediation efforts, as demonstrated by Oscar Herrera's pursuit of declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this automotive parts and services retailer accused of?

The lawsuit alleges WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including issues with keyboard focus order, unannounced submenus, missing controls for moving content on carousels, unclear link purposes, insufficient contrast ratios, unlabeled images of text, invisible focus indicators, and unannounced form field labels.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses whose websites may not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for digital accessibility barriers and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Automotive Parts and S.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer