Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 9, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Missing Alt Text on ImagesKeyboard Navigation IssuesScreen Reader IncompatibilityPoor Color ContrastForm Field Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online apparel retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on April 9, 2024. The complaint, filed by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating federal disability laws.

The complaint details several WCAG violations experienced by the plaintiff, including missing meaningful descriptions for images and banner images, product images announced generically (e.g., "product name image number 1"), carousel buttons announced without context, keyboard navigation failures (e.g., store locator page, size selection feature), skipped prices on product pages, issues with form fields (e.g., "Check availability" announcing "dialog, you can type, enter selected blank" instead of "enter address"), poor contrast, and the absence of a zoom feature. These barriers prevent screen-reader users from fully utilizing the website for shopping, store location, and communication.

This case underscores the ongoing legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating online stores, especially those with physical retail locations, face potential lawsuits under ADA Title III if their websites do not comply with established accessibility standards, particularly concerning screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of having images without meaningful descriptions, product images announced generically, carousel buttons lacking context, banner images without descriptions, a store locator page with unannounced addresses and non-functional keyboard navigation, skipped prices, keyboard navigation failures on size selection, incorrect field form announcements (e.g., "dialog, you can type, enter selected blank"), poor contrast, and no zoom feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a significant legal risk for businesses with e-commerce websites, particularly those that also operate physical stores, if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to visually impaired users. Failure to comply with ADA Title III requirements for website accessibility can lead to similar injunctive relief actions and financial penalties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online apparel retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer