Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 24, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsIncorrect Element AnnunciationKeyboard Focus Order

Case Summary

James Watson has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on April 24, 2024, against an online fashion retailer. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible, denying him equal access to goods, products, and services available to sighted users.

The complaint specifically details several alleged WCAG violations, including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) where content in a size guide table lacks proper labels; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) concerning a date picker popup that is not announced and does not receive automatic focus; Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) as the main menu button is only announced as "menu button"; Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) where a 'Clear' button is announced as "empty button button"; and Guideline 2.4.6 (Headings and Labels) due to unlabeled fields on the account registration form, such as date of birth combo boxes.

This action highlights the significant legal exposure for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Companies in the retail sector, particularly those with online sales platforms, risk facing similar lawsuits for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses if their digital properties are not designed to be fully accessible and independently usable by individuals with visual disabilities, ensuring equal access for all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of violations including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to unlabeled table content, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) regarding an inaccessible date picker popup, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for an unlabeled menu button, Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) with an improperly announced 'Clear' button, and Guideline 2.4.6 (Headings and Labels) concerning unlabeled account registration fields.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by James Watson, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses that their websites may be found in violation of ADA Title III if they are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, leading to demands for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer