Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 15, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAContrast (Minimum) 1.4.3Focus Visible 2.4.7Labels or Instructions 3.3.2Error Identification 3.3.1

Case Summary

Alejandro Espinoza has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on May 15, 2024, against an online clothing retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired, alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous access barriers that prevent him from fully and equally accessing its goods, services, and information using screen reader software.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level AA violations. These include insufficient contrast (1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)), a lack of visible keyboard focus indicators on navigation links (2.4.7 Focus Visible), and the absence of proper labels or instructions for critical input fields like color and size selectors (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions). Additionally, the lawsuit cites a failure to identify input errors for various forms, such as missing size inputs for adding items to a bag, incomplete payment details (card number, expiry date, security code), and missing personal information during account creation (first name, last name, date of birth, email) (3.3.1 Error Identification).

This case underscores the significant legal exposure for other e-commerce websites and online platforms that do not adhere to digital accessibility standards. Businesses in similar industries risk ADA Title III litigation, which may result in demands for injunctive relief, compensatory damages for alleged trespass to personal property, and the recovery of the plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level AA violations including insufficient contrast (1.4.3), invisible keyboard focus indicators (2.4.7), missing labels for input fields (3.3.2), and inadequate error identification for form submissions (3.3.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Alejandro Espinoza, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal imperative for all e-commerce websites to ensure digital accessibility, as non-compliance can result in ADA Title III lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages for trespass, and the recovery of legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer