Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 11, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Form LabelsDynamic Content Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Oscar Herrera filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on June 11, 2024, alleging that a restaurant website is not accessible to blind and visually disabled individuals, violating ADA Title III. This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses for unlawful disability discrimination.

The complaint, filed by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include inaccessible menu links that do not receive focus or are not announced (Guideline 1.3.2), lack of controls to pause or stop automatically rotating carousels (Guideline 2.2.2), focus order issues with hidden elements and pop-ups that are not announced (Guideline 2.4.3), unannounced instructions for reCAPTCHA on forms (Guideline 2.4.3), lack of error message announcements on form submissions (Guideline 3.3.1), unlabeled buttons on reservation forms (Guideline 3.3.2), and allergen selection buttons not announcing their 'selected' state (Guideline 4.1.2). Additionally, an unannounced countdown timer on the reservation form only says 'blank' (Guideline 4.1.3). The e-commerce website's accessibility widget/application was also found to be inadequate.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for online food and beverage establishments whose digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to disabled users. Businesses in similar industries face potential ADA Title III discrimination lawsuits if their websites do not comply with WCAG standards, underscoring the necessity for robust accessibility practices to ensure effective communication and equal access for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant website accused of?

The restaurant website is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including inaccessible menu links, lack of controls for automatically rotating content, focus order issues with hidden elements and pop-ups, unannounced instructions for CAPTCHA, unannounced error messages on forms, unlabeled buttons, selected state of allergen buttons not being announced, and an unannounced countdown timer.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates legal risk for online food and beverage establishments that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to ADA Title III discrimination claims if WCAG standards are not met.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Website. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer