Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and home goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 28, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

ADA Title III WebsiteWCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships)WCAG 2.4.3 (Focus Order)WCAG 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions)WCAG 4.1.2 (NameRoleValue)

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA has filed a federal lawsuit against an online clothing and home goods retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on June 28, 2024. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses for unlawful disability discrimination in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alongside a common law tort claim for trespass.

The complaint details numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations experienced by the blind plaintiff using screen reader software. These include inaccessible size guides (WCAG 1.3.1), unannounced pop-ups (WCAG 2.4.3), an unlabeled graphic logo (WCAG 2.4.4), incorrectly announced product size buttons and simultaneously announced promotional pop-up content (WCAG 3.3.2), and unlabeled 'Cart' and 'Search' buttons (WCAG 4.1.2), and unannounced sold-out messages (WCAG 4.1.3). Additionally, the plaintiff alleges trespass due to the installation of information tracking software and browser cookies without knowledge or consent.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks for e-commerce websites, such as this online clothing and home goods retailer, that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses with inaccessible digital platforms face potential demands for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees, highlighting the imperative for comprehensive digital accessibility to avoid similar legal challenges and ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and home goods retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 1.3.1 (Inaccessible size guides), WCAG 2.4.3 (Unannounced pop-ups and focus order issues), WCAG 2.4.4 (Unlabeled graphic links), WCAG 3.3.2 (Incorrectly announced buttons and promotional content), WCAG 4.1.2 (Unlabeled interactive elements), and WCAG 4.1.3 (Unannounced status messages).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that e-commerce platforms risk ADA Title III lawsuits for website accessibility failures, potentially leading to court-ordered remediation, injunctive relief, and financial penalties, including compensatory damages and attorney's fees, and additional common law tort claims.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and ho.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer