Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Smoothie Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 22, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Compliance FailureMissing Alt Text & Unlabeled ButtonsInaccessible PDFs & Structural Information BarriersKeyboard Navigation & Focus Order IssuesInsufficient Color Contrast

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 22, 2024, against an online food and beverage retailer operating a chain of restaurants/juice bars. The plaintiff, who is blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous accessibility barriers preventing full and equal access, constituting a violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including unlabeled buttons (Non-Text Content 1.1.1), inaccessible PDF documents (Info and Relationships 1.3.1) which prevent screen reader users from understanding nutritional information, and issues with focus order (2.4.3) where interactive elements like right arrows and location pins are not announced. Further violations include unlabeled social media links (Link Purpose 2.4.4), mislabeled buttons such as “Find Locations” announced as “search button” (Labels or Instructions 3.3.2), and a lack of announcements for “remove” buttons (Name, Role, Value 4.1.2). Additionally, the website exhibits insufficient color contrast for text (Contrast (Minimum) 1.4.3) and graphical objects (Non-Text Contrast 1.4.11), failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. The plaintiff also claims the defendant lacks an effective accessibility statement or contact method for disabled users.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites and physical public accommodations that fail to ensure digital accessibility for visually disabled individuals. The ongoing alleged violations underscore the necessity for comprehensive website remediation, a clear web accessibility policy, and dedicated accessibility support, as non-compliance can lead to continuous harm, injunctive relief, and an award of attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online food and beverage retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of multiple WCAG violations including unlabeled non-text content, inaccessible PDF documents, issues with keyboard focus order, unlabeled links, mislabeled interactive elements, and insufficient color contrast for both text and graphical objects.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses of continuous ADA Title III violations, potential injunctive relief orders, and liability for the plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs due to inaccessible websites.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Smoothie Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer