Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 23, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Non-text ContentImproper Focus OrderMeaningful Sequence IssuesMissing Labels/Instructions

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO has filed a federal lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the Southern District of Florida on July 23, 2024, alleging violations of ADA Title III due to an inaccessible e-commerce website. The complaint, brought by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, asserts that the digital platform fails to provide equal access for visually impaired users by containing numerous access barriers that prevent full and free use by those who rely on screen reader software.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including: User cannot bypass blocks of content, User cannot navigate to all elements or in a meaningful way, User cannot operate registration/shipping forms or filters, and critical links like "go to main content" are unreachable or invisible (WCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard Level A). The complaint also cites incorrect screen reader messages for invalid input (WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification Level A), missing descriptions for non-text content such as image upload buttons and incorrect communication of element counts within filters (WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content Level A), and focus order issues preventing sequential navigation after certain interactions (WCAG 2.4.3 Focus Order Level A). Additionally, the plaintiff alleges meaningful sequence is not preserved when modals cover page elements (WCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence Level A), lack of alerts for time limitations (WCAG 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable Level AA), and absence of labels/descriptions for link purposes (WCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose Level A) and input instructions (WCAG 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions Level A).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by businesses whose digital platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies with e-commerce websites must ensure compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines to avoid potential litigation and ensure an inclusive online experience for all users, including providing proper cookie policy audibilization and consent mechanisms to prevent claims of trespass.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of violations including: Keyboard (2.1.1), Error Identification (3.3.1), Non-text Content (1.1.1), Focus Order (2.4.3), Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2), Timing Adjustable (2.2.1), Link Purpose (2.4.4), and Labels or Instructions (3.3.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA CASTRO filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal vulnerability of online businesses that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to disabled individuals, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages for alleged trespass.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer