Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Auto-Parts Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 30, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureInput Error IdentificationLow Contrast

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an auto-parts retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on July 30, 2024. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including skipped prices, missing "alt" text for images (announcing them as "graphic link"), skipped address and delivery information, navigation issues with the cursor skipping information, components not receiving focus in a meaningful order, unannounced input errors, and an incomprehensible checkout process with the inability to remove cart items. Additionally, the website is cited for poor contrast in background, text, and products, and lacks a zoom feature, directly impeding screen-reader software functionality.

This case highlights significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. Similar online retailers, especially those with physical stores and online platforms for sales and store location, could face lawsuits if their digital interfaces are not compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this auto-parts retailer accused of?

The auto-parts retailer is accused of issues such as skipped prices, missing "alt" text for images, skipped address and delivery information, navigation problems where the cursor skips content, components not receiving focus in a logical order, unannounced input errors, and an incomprehensible checkout process with no ability to remove items from the cart. The website also has poor contrast and lacks a zoom feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Raymond T. Mahlberg, and the plaintiff is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that are not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, particularly regarding screen-reader compatibility and other WCAG standards. Failure to comply can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to mandate website accessibility, as well as potential awards for attorney's fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Auto-Parts Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer