Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Chain Operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 23, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible Names/LabelsUnclear Link PurposeLack of Status Message Feedback

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a restaurant chain operator in federal court on August 23, 2024. The complaint also includes a common law trespass claim related to personal property, alleging the unauthorized installation of tracking software.

The lawsuit asserts that the e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from full and equal use. Specific alleged WCAG violations include a mislabeled shopping bag item count, an unclear quantity option for shopping cart items, an absence of confirmation for item removal, and a mislabeled logo that functions as a link to the homepage. Furthermore, an installed third-party accessibility widget/plugin was found to be ineffective in providing a viable alternative means of access.

This case highlights the ongoing legal imperative for businesses operating public accommodation websites to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III requirements can result in costly litigation, demands for injunctive relief to remediate websites, and potential compensatory damages, emphasizing the need for proactive WCAG adherence to avoid such legal challenges.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain operator accused of?

The restaurant chain operator's website is accused of having a mislabeled shopping bag item count, an unclear quantity option for items in the shopping cart, no confirmation for item removal from the cart, and a mislabeled logo that links to the homepage. Additionally, an installed accessibility widget/plugin was deemed ineffective.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. It indicates a significant risk of lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief requiring extensive website remediation, and potential compensatory damages if digital platforms fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant Chain Operator. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer