Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online ski and snowboard gear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 3, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A/AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityFocus Order IssuesMissing Error Identification

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online ski and snowboard gear retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 3, 2024. The plaintiff, who is blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers that prevent full and equal access to its goods and services.

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including issues with 'Meaningful Sequence' (1.3.2) where filter options and pop-ups were not properly announced or given focus. Significant 'Keyboard' accessibility failures (2.1.1) rendered drop-down menus, 'Buy Now' options, 'more info' buttons, 'Size Guide' links, and product selection inaccessible. The 'Bypass Blocks' (2.4.1) feature was ineffective, and 'Focus Order' (2.4.3) was illogical, with pop-ups not announced and tabbing skipping interactive elements. Furthermore, the website lacked proper 'Error Identification' (3.3.1) on forms, and the 'accessibility' statement itself was inaccessible.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with ADA Title III requirements and WCAG standards. Companies that operate similar online platforms for retail sales must ensure their digital assets are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities to avoid potential litigation and ensure equal access to their offerings.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online ski and snowboard gear retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of violating WCAG guidelines including Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2) with unannounced pop-ups and inaccessible filter options, Keyboard (2.1.1) failures for menus and interactive elements, ineffective Bypass Blocks (2.4.1), illogical Focus Order (2.4.3), and missing Error Identification (3.3.1) on forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with e-commerce websites that do not meet ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards, potentially leading to lawsuits alleging denial of full and equal access for visually disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online ski and snowboa.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer