Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fresh food market website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 20, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

Keyboard Navigation FailureFocus Visible IssuesMeaningful Sequence FailureError Identification FailureADA Title III Website Accessibility

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fresh food market retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 20, 2024.

The complaint specifically alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 violations, including Keyboard (2.1.1) issues such as the inability to operate skip links, search bars, and navigation menus. Focus Visible (2.4.7) failures are cited for the search bar lacking an indicator and text visibility. Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2) is violated by hidden navigation menus and an overlapping video modal. Focus Order (2.4.3) is compromised by focus being given to hidden elements or elements behind a modal. Additionally, multiple instances of Error Identification (3.3.1) failures are claimed, where the website fails to provide clear error messages for empty or invalid form fields.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating similar e-commerce platforms must ensure their digital interfaces comply with WCAG standards to avoid potential discrimination claims under the ADA Title III, especially concerning screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation for visually impaired users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fresh food market website accused of?

The website is accused of Keyboard (2.1.1) navigation failures, lack of Focus Visible (2.4.7) indicators, issues with Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2) and Focus Order (2.4.3), and failures in Error Identification (3.3.1) for form fields.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar online retailers who may face ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, particularly regarding keyboard operability, screen reader compatibility, and clear error messaging.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fresh food market websi.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer