Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Cafe and Restaurant Group

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 2, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt TextWCAG 2.0 AA Non-ComplianceADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on October 2, 2024, alleging that a hospitality group operating cafes and restaurants with an online presence has violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The complaint asserts that the defendant's website, which serves as a critical point of sale and information gateway, is not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals.

The lawsuit specifically details several digital accessibility barriers. These include the website's telephone number lacking a full description, the home page logo being mislabeled and without descriptive purpose, and text throughout the site being improperly labeled, causing screen reader software to skip crucial information. Furthermore, product names are inaccessible when navigating with a keyboard, and there is an absence of an effective "accessibility" notice or policy for disabled users. The complaint also highlights the failure to add alternative text to graphics, to ensure all website functions are operable via keyboard, and asserts that the website does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This case underscores the ongoing legal exposure for businesses operating online platforms that do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses, especially those with brick-and-mortar operations supported by a digital presence, face significant risk of litigation if their websites fail to provide equal access and effective communication for disabled users. To mitigate this, companies must implement comprehensive web accessibility policies, conduct regular accessibility audits, provide alternative communication methods, and ensure auxiliary aids are integrated to achieve full digital inclusion.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online cafe and restaurant group accused of?

The group's website is accused of having a telephone number that lacks a full description, a mislabeled home page logo without descriptive purpose, and improperly labeled text causing screen readers to skip information. Other violations include inaccessible product names for keyboard navigation, the absence of an accessibility notice, missing alternative text for graphics, and a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards for keyboard operability.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for businesses, particularly those with online platforms supporting physical locations, that do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Failure to provide equal and effective digital access for disabled users can lead to litigation, necessitating the implementation of robust accessibility policies, audits, and communication alternatives.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Cafe and Restau.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer