Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online retail company

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 15, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Accessible NameInsufficient Descriptive Text

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on October 15, 2024, alleging disability discrimination against an online retailer of women's bags, luggage, accessories, gifts, home goods, and apparel.

The complaint details several accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including a mislabeled logo that fails to convey its purpose to screen reader users, a non-functioning tab key that prevents users from identifying their location on the site, and product color options that are read aloud but lack sufficient descriptions for comprehension by visually disabled individuals. The lawsuit also asserts the website fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by other online retailers whose websites do not comply with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards, particularly concerning effective communication and equal access for visually disabled users, potentially leading to similar litigation and demands for injunctive relief and damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online retail company accused of?

The online retail company is accused of having a mislabeled logo (screen reader incompatibility), a non-functioning tab key (keyboard navigation failure), and product color options lacking sufficient descriptions for screen reader users (missing descriptive text for visual elements).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

, and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for similar e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to visually disabled individuals, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and compensatory damages for non-compliance with web accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online retail company. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer