Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 29, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A/AA ComplianceKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Order IssuesUnclear Link PurposeUnlabeled Interactive Elements

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 29, 2024, against a restaurant chain and its online ordering platform.

The complaint alleges several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with meaningful sequence (focus jumps non-meaningfully), keyboard accessibility (buttons inaccessible), focus order (navigation menu and menu pages not fully accessible), unclear link purposes (unlabeled third-party links), and missing name, role, value for interactive elements such as buttons and combo boxes. The plaintiff also noted a lack of an accessibility policy, coordinator, testing groups, or a dedicated customer assistance line for visually disabled users.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risk for businesses, particularly those in the food and beverage industry with online ordering capabilities, of facing litigation if their digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to disabled individuals who rely on screen reader software. Companies must implement comprehensive web accessibility policies, conduct regular audits, and provide alternative communication methods to ensure compliance with the ADA and avoid similar legal challenges.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

This online food and beverage retailer is accused of meaningful sequence issues (WCAG 1.3.2 A), keyboard accessibility failures for interactive elements (WCAG 2.1.1 A), incorrect focus order on navigation and menu pages (WCAG 2.4.3 A), unclear link purposes (WCAG 2.4.4 A), and missing name, role, value for interactive elements like buttons and combo boxes (WCAG 4.1.2 A).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit. He is represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

Businesses operating websites that serve as extensions of public accommodations face legal risks under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. This includes potential lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs for failing to provide equal access to online goods, services, and information.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Restaurant Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer