Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online lingerie retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AA ComplianceKeyboard Navigation BarriersScreen Reader InaccessibilityMissing Labels and InstructionsFocus Order Issues

Case Summary

ARANTZA CASTRO has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online lingerie retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 5, 2024. The plaintiff alleges the defendant's website is not accessible to visually impaired individuals, thus preventing equal access to its services and products.

The complaint details multiple WCAG 2.1 violations, including 2.4.7 Focus Visible, where keyboard focus indicators are absent on key elements; 1.3.1 Info and Relationships, citing screen readers failing to announce prices and filter categories lacking descriptions; 2.1.1 Keyboard, for non-operable interactive elements such as slider controls and add-to-cart buttons; 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks, noting the absence of skip navigation mechanisms; 2.4.3 Focus Order, due to disrupted navigation sequences and focus issues with modals; 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, for unclear guidance on price filters and form fields; and 3.3.1 Error Identification, concerning the lack of error messages in login and registration forms.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, underscoring the necessity for robust WCAG compliance to avoid similar legal actions and potential claims for damages and injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online lingerie retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG violations including missing focus indicators, screen readers not announcing prices, non-operable keyboard elements (sliders, add-to-cart), lack of bypass mechanisms, incorrect focus order, missing labels/instructions for filters and forms, and inadequate error identification in forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for online businesses that fail to meet web accessibility standards, particularly WCAG, potentially leading to lawsuits alleging discrimination and demanding injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees for non-compliance with ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online lingerie retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer