Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Medical Spa

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard NavigationWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 4.1.2 NameRoleValueWCAG 4.1.3 Status MessagesADA Title III Website Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a medical spa in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on November 5, 2024. Represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, Lucius, who is legally blind, alleges that the medical spa's website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers.

The complaint details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include the absence of a 'Skip to Content' link, an inaccessible 'search' button, and expandable detail sections that lack tab focus for screen reader users. Additionally, clickable Instagram links are unlabeled, booking confirmation processes lack error notifications, 'Favorite Location' and 'Directions' buttons are announced generically as "button," and there are no verbal notifications for "Add to Cart" or "Favorite Location" status messages for non-sighted users.

This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating online platforms that fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards. Companies in the medical spa and similar industries, particularly those with a strong nexus between their physical locations and digital services, must ensure their websites are independently usable by individuals with disabilities to avoid potential litigation and uphold civil rights.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this medical spa accused of?

The medical spa is accused of WCAG violations including the absence of a 'Skip to Content' link, an inaccessible 'search' button, expandable detail sections lacking tab focus, unlabeled clickable Instagram links, missing error notifications in the booking process, generic announcements for 'Favorite Location' and 'Directions' buttons, and no verbal status notifications for 'Add to Cart' or 'Favorite Location' actions.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for medical spas and similar businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits and requirements for costly website modifications, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Medical Spa. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer