Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Aesthetic Services Provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 8, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard NavigationWCAG 2.4.1 Bypass BlocksWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against an aesthetic services provider in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 8, 2024. The complaint, filed by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, seeking injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses JAWS Screen Reader software, asserts that the defendant's website is not fully accessible. Alleged WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations include: issues with information and relationships where original and sale prices are visually differentiated but announced the same by screen readers; keyboard navigation failures on FAQs and expandable detail sections; absence of a 'Skip to Content' link, requiring 109 tabs to bypass navigation; focus order issues where cart pop-ups are not announced or given focus; and lack of error notifications during the booking process for input fields.

This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for businesses, particularly those in the health and beauty services sector, operating e-commerce or informational websites. Companies with digital platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines face potential litigation, demonstrating the critical need for comprehensive digital accessibility to ensure equal access for all users, including those with visual impairments.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this aesthetic services provider accused of?

The aesthetic services provider is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, including issues with information and relationships (visually differentiated prices announced the same), keyboard accessibility (inaccessible FAQs, expandable detail sections), bypass blocks (missing 'Skip to Content' link), focus order (cart pop-ups not announced), and error identification (no error notifications during booking).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for businesses, especially those offering health and beauty services online, if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and attorney's fees, underscoring the necessity for robust digital accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Aesthetic Services Provid.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer