Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Skin Care Clinic

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 8, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Order IssuesMissing Accessible NamesError Identification Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on November 8, 2024, against a skin care clinic operating a website.

The complaint alleges multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guideline violations, making the defendant's website inaccessible to visually impaired users. Specific issues include a lack of meaningful sequence (Guideline 1.3.2) where focus returns to an image on cart pop-up, keyboard navigation failures for links and submenus (Guideline 2.1.1), focus order problems (Guideline 2.4.3) where cart pop-ups are not announced or discount fields are tabbed past, unannounced error notifications during booking (Guideline 3.3.1), and missing accessible names, roles, and values (Guideline 4.1.2) for elements like referral links and cart adjustment buttons.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating digital platforms, especially those linked to physical places of public accommodation. Companies offering services through websites must ensure their platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, including those who are legally blind and rely on screen reader software. Failure to comply with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guidelines can lead to significant litigation, requiring injunctive relief, attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this skin care clinic accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including issues with meaningful sequence (WCAG 1.3.2), keyboard navigation (WCAG 2.1.1), focus order (WCAG 2.4.3), error identification (WCAG 3.3.1), and missing accessible names, roles, and values for elements like buttons and links (WCAG 4.1.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with websites that are not fully accessible to disabled users, especially those using screen readers, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Skin Care Clinic. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer