Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Market Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 13, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsImages of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 13, 2024. The complaint alleges that an online restaurant and market chain's website discriminates against disabled users by not being fully accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with meaningful sequence preventing accurate screen reader reading of menus, keyboard accessibility failures for navigation menus and date pickers, lack of error identification for required input selections, and interactive elements lacking meaningful labels, such as a 'Wine' menu link announced as 'coral gables bird (numbers) link' and combo boxes announced as 'list submenu'. Additionally, images of text on the dinner menu are not readable by screen reader software, hindering full comprehension for visually disabled users.

This case underscores the ongoing legal exposure for online businesses, particularly those operating in the food and beverage industry with brick-and-mortar locations and associated websites. The complaint emphasizes that a lack of full and equal access to digital platforms, which serve as extensions of physical public accommodations, can lead to claims of discrimination under the ADA. Businesses must ensure their websites are fully navigable and perceivable by assistive technologies, or risk similar litigation for failing to provide effective communication and equal access to all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant and market chain accused of?

The restaurant and market chain is accused of several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including meaningful sequence issues for screen readers on menus, keyboard accessibility failures for navigation menus and date pickers, lack of error identification for input errors, interactive elements lacking meaningful labels (e.g., 'Wine' link, combo boxes), and images of text being unreadable by screen reader software.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

OSCAR HERRERA filed this lawsuit. He is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses, especially those in the food and beverage industry with online ordering and informational websites, regarding their compliance with ADA Title III. Failure to provide a fully accessible digital platform can lead to lawsuits alleging discrimination and demanding injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs for denying equal access to disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Market Cha.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer