Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Wellness Center Operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 15, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ESQ. P.A.

WCAG 2.2 AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextImproper Semantic Structure

Case Summary

Plaintiff ANDREE CAMPBELL has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 15, 2024, against a wellness center operator. Represented by ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ESQ. P.A., the plaintiff alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from fully accessing its services.

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including an incorrectly defined landmark structure with repetitive labels, improperly defined and missing heading hierarchy, and a navigation menu that expanded automatically after receiving focus. The website featured video-only content without text transcripts or audio tracks, and non-interactive elements were marked as keyboard-focusable lacking appropriate role attributes. Interactive elements suffered from inappropriate/non-descriptive names, failed to announce their roles, and had ambiguous link text. Additionally, social media and external links opened new windows without warning, and the website exhibited keyboard navigation failures, preventing users from accessing elements like the date selector on the booking page. These barriers made it impossible for the plaintiff to effectively navigate or use the online platform to book services.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites and digital platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III accessibility standards, specifically WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Such non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits, requiring businesses to implement extensive modifications, policy changes, and accessibility training, in addition to potential financial remedies for plaintiffs and their legal counsel. It underscores the importance of proactive digital accessibility audits and remediation for all public accommodations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this wellness center's website accused of?

The website is accused of having an incorrectly defined landmark structure, improper heading hierarchy, ambiguous link titles, unlabeled buttons and graphics, inaccessible date selectors, keyboard navigation failures, video-only content without transcripts, non-interactive elements marked as keyboard-focusable, and external links opening without warning.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm is representing the plaintiff?

ANDREE CAMPBELL filed this lawsuit, represented by ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ES

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This creates significant legal risk for other businesses with e-commerce websites that do not meet ADA Title III accessibility standards, particularly WCAG 2.2 Level AA, as they may face similar lawsuits demanding extensive accessibility overhauls, policy changes, and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Wellness Center Operator. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer