Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a national restaurant chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 25, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A/AAMeaningful Sequence (1.3.2)Keyboard Navigation Failure (2.1.1)Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)Focus Order Issues (2.4.3)

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on November 25, 2024, alleging that a national restaurant chain's website fails to comply with ADA Title III digital accessibility standards, specifically impacting visually disabled users.

The complaint details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including a lack of meaningful sequence (1.3.2) for tab and arrow key navigation, inaccessible clickable menu items and "Read More" links for keyboard-only users (2.1.1), unselectable required and optional modification options for online orders (2.1.1), a non-functioning "Skip to Main Content" link (2.4.1), and focus order issues (2.4.3) rendering various navigation and footer links, pickup options, and certain FAQ category buttons inaccessible.

This case highlights significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that do not ensure full and equal access for visually disabled users. Failure to implement reasonable modifications, provide auxiliary aids and services, and adhere to WCAG standards can lead to similar ADA Title III lawsuits, necessitating costly remediation, legal fees, and reputational damage for companies relying on digital platforms for customer engagement and sales.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this national restaurant chain accused of?

The national restaurant chain is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including issues with meaningful sequence (1.3.2) affecting tab/arrow key navigation, multiple keyboard accessibility failures (2.1.1) for menu items and modification options, focus order problems (2.4.3) on various pages, and a non-functioning bypass block (2.4.1) for skipping to main content.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Oscar Herrera, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for e-commerce businesses that fail to maintain accessible websites. It demonstrates that companies risk lawsuits, injunctions, and financial penalties if their digital platforms exclude disabled users, particularly those relying on screen readers, thereby violating ADA Title III requirements for public accommodations.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a national restaurant cha.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer