Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Asian kitchen and sushi restaurant chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Non-ConformanceMissing Alt TextMislabeled LinksScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on December 5, 2024, against an Asian kitchen and sushi restaurant chain. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website, which acts as an extension and gateway to its physical restaurants, is not accessible to blind and visually disabled individuals who rely on screen reader software.

The lawsuit specifically cites numerous WCAG violations, including mislabeled links (such as social media links), a mislabeled logo that fails to relay its purpose to screen reader users, mislabeled images of restaurant locations, and inaccessible pricing and ingredient information. Additionally, the complaint states a lack of an accessibility notice, policy, committee, coordinator, bug fix priority policy, automated testing program, specialized customer assistance, and a proper information portal for disabled individuals. The website is also alleged to not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher versions of web accessibility, and it lacks the universal symbol for the disabled.

This legal action highlights the significant risk for businesses, particularly those with physical public accommodations that also offer online services like menu browsing, ordering, and gift card purchases, if their digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses with similar models must proactively address accessibility barriers to avoid potential litigation and ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

This restaurant chain is accused of having mislabeled links, a mislabeled logo, mislabeled images, inaccessible pricing and ingredient information, and a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher. The lawsuit also notes a lack of an accessibility policy, coordinator, bug fix priority policy, automated testing, and proper customer assistance for visually disabled users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for restaurant chains and similar businesses whose websites act as an extension of their physical public accommodations. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits, requiring substantial investments in remediation and legal defense to ensure digital accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Asian kitchen and sush.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer