Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 24, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC; Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAKeyboard Operability FailureForm Field Labels and Error IdentificationMeaningful Sequence and Focus Order IssuesInsufficient Color Contrast

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on December 24, 2024, alleging that an online apparel retailer's website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to provide accessible features for visually impaired users employing screen reader software.

The complaint details multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including issues with Labels or Instructions (3.3.2) where country input fields lack proper labels, Error Identification (3.3.1) due to missing error messages on search and account creation forms, and Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2) and Focus Order (2.4.3) problems stemming from unclosable modals that disrupt navigation. Additionally, the lawsuit cites insufficient Contrast (Minimum) (1.4.3 Level AA) for content behind modals and Keyboard (2.1.1 Level A) failures, making main menu links and color selection inoperable for users relying on keyboard navigation.

This lawsuit underscores the critical importance for all online apparel retailers to rigorously audit and remediate their digital platforms to ensure full compliance with ADA Title III and web accessibility standards. Businesses that do not provide equivalent access for disabled users risk legal challenges, injunctive relief, and compensatory damages, as well as attorney's fees, highlighting the ongoing legal imperative for digital inclusivity in e-commerce.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including: 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, 3.3.1 Error Identification, 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, 2.4.3 Focus Order, 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), and 2.1.1 Keyboard operability issues.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online businesses failing to provide accessible websites for disabled users, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, court-ordered injunctive relief to correct accessibility barriers, and demands for attorney's fees and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer