Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Dental Services Provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 6, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

WCAG 2.2 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityLogical Reading Order FailureMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

Nicholas Pagan has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a dental services provider in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on January 6, 2025. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby denying equal access to goods and services.

The complaint specifically asserts several accessibility barriers including the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, an inaccessible "Schedule Now" feature for screen readers, and content where meaning and structure are not conveyed beyond visual presentation. Further violations include an incorrect reading sequence for content, missing webpage titles, images without adequate descriptions for screen reader users (specifically client reviews and promotions), and the absence of an adequate accessibility policy.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses, especially those in the healthcare and service industries, that operate an online presence integrated with their physical locations. To mitigate potential lawsuits, significant legal fees, and the need for costly remediation, similar businesses must ensure their websites comply with WCAG 2.2 AA guidelines.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this dental services provider accused of?

This dental services provider is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, having a "Schedule Now" feature not recognized by screen readers, failing to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, incorrect logical reading order, missing webpage titles, and images without descriptions for screen reader users. An inadequate accessibility policy is also cited.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nicholas Pagan filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm Alberto R. Leal, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal risk for any business whose website serves as an extension of a physical public accommodation, facing potential ADA Title III claims if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly regarding WCAG 2.2 AA standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Dental Services Provider. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer