Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a beauty and wellness Medspa

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 6, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Video AlternativesKeyboard Navigation FailureImproper Focus OrderMissing Field Labels

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online beauty and wellness Medspa. The case was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on January 6, 2025, with representation from J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include Guideline 1.2.1 (Audio-only and Video-only) due to the absence of alternatives for video content, Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) where multiple elements like buttons and links are skipped during keyboard navigation, and Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) where tab focus jumps incorrectly on payment and appointment booking pages. Additionally, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) is cited for unannounced field labels and inaccessible links.

This lawsuit highlights the critical importance for all businesses operating an online beauty and wellness platform to ensure full compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA standards. Failure to provide accessible digital services, particularly for visually impaired users, exposes an online Medspa to significant legal risks, potential injunctions, and financial liabilities, as demonstrated by the detailed accessibility barriers outlined in this complaint.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty and wellness Medspa accused of?

The online beauty and wellness Medspa is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations, including Guideline 1.2.1 (Audio-only and Video-only) for missing video alternatives, Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) for skipped interactive elements, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for incorrect tab sequences, and Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unannounced labels and inaccessible links.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff Windy Lucius, and she is represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for similar online businesses, emphasizing the need for their websites to be fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III. Non-compliance can lead to lawsuits, court-ordered injunctions to remediate accessibility barriers, and awards of attorney's fees and litigation expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a beauty and wellness Med.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer