Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Coffee Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 10, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AWCAG 2.1 AANon-Text Content (1.1.1)Keyboard Navigation (2.1.1)Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

James Watson, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC, has filed a lawsuit against an online coffee retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The original complaint was filed on November 29, 2024, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Miami-Dade County Code 11A-19(1).

The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses JAWS Screen Reader software, alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guideline violations on the defendant's website. These include issues with non-text content (carousel slides announced as "blank" or "clickable" only), information and relationships (menu content inaccessible, prices announced without context), keyboard accessibility (Quick Add button not receiving focus), focus order (popups and offers not announced), labels or instructions (search button unlabeled), images of text (sign-up image not announced), and status messages (cart updates not announced to screen readers).

This action highlights the significant legal risk for digital businesses, particularly those with e-commerce functionality, that fail to provide an accessible online experience for visually impaired users. Any online retailer or service provider whose website integrates with physical locations or offers public services digitally risks similar ADA Title III claims if their platforms do not conform to WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guidelines, leading to potential demands for injunctive relief and monetary damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online coffee retailer accused of?

The online coffee retailer is accused of numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including non-text content not being announced, inaccessible menu information, keyboard navigation failures (e.g., Quick Add button), improper focus order for popups and offers, unlabeled search buttons, unannounced images of text, and status messages for cart updates not being communicated to screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

James Watson filed this lawsuit, and is represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case illustrates that online businesses, especially those that act as extensions of physical public accommodations, face legal challenges under ADA Title III if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users. Non-compliance with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA standards can lead to demands for injunctive relief and monetary damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Coffee Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer