Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online gaming products retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 13, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A & AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Comparison ChartsUnclear Link Purpose

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 13, 2025, against an online retailer of gaming and gaming-related products.

The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website maintains significant access barriers for visually disabled users relying on screen reader software. Specifically, the lawsuit details violations of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guidelines, including issues with comparison charts not being accurately read by screen readers (Guideline 1.3.1 - Info and Relationships), a "$10 off" dialog not receiving focus or being announced (Guideline 2.4.3 - Focus Order), a "back" button announced only as "link" without clear purpose (Guideline 2.4.4 - Link Purpose (In Context)), a "Cart (11) link" being announced as "cart zero items link" (Guideline 2.4.4 - Link Purpose (In Context) (2)), the cart button announcing "Zero items in cart button collapsed" despite items being present (Guideline 3.3.2 - Labels or Instructions), and an incorrectly labeled "Checkout" button announced as "Cart zero items link" (Guideline 4.1.2 - Name, Role, Value).

This legal action highlights the critical importance for businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites with a nexus to physical stores, to ensure full digital accessibility. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can result in similar litigation, necessitating costly remediation efforts, legal fees, and reputational damage.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online gaming products retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including inaccessible comparison charts (1.3.1), focus order issues with promotional dialogs (2.4.3), unclear link purposes for navigation and cart elements (2.4.4), incorrect labeling of cart contents and checkout buttons (3.3.2, 4.1.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by OSCAR HERRERA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for online retailers whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. It demonstrates that non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to federal lawsuits, mandating site remediation, and incurring significant legal expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online gaming products.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer