ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Florida food and beverage company
Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.
Case Summary
YUDY HERNANDEZ, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online food and beverage company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 13, 2025. The plaintiff alleges that the e-commerce website violates ADA Title III by failing to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals.
The complaint details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with auto-playing content lacking controls (2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide), a non-meaningful sequence when navigating a GDPR modal (1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence), a non-sequential focus order hindering GDPR modal operation (2.4.3 Focus Order), and insufficient contrast for text behind the GDPR modal (1.4.3 Contrast Minimum). Additionally, the e-commerce website is cited for multiple instances of failing to provide error identification for missing input fields in contact forms, location searches, promo code applications, and checkout payment details (3.3.1 Error Identification). An inaccessible "accessibility" statement and widget were also noted, preventing effective navigation for blind and visually disabled users.
This lawsuit underscores the critical legal risk faced by online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies with e-commerce websites must proactively audit and remediate accessibility barriers, particularly concerning user interface elements, error handling, and interactive features, to avoid similar litigation and comply with ADA Title III requirements for equal access to goods and services.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online food and beverage retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (auto-playing content without controls), 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence (non-sequential navigation of GDPR modal), 2.4.3 Focus Order (non-sequential focus for GDPR modal), 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (insufficient text contrast behind GDPR modal), and multiple instances of 3.3.1 Error Identification (missing error messages for form inputs, location search, promo codes, and payment details). An ineffective accessibility widget/plugin was also cited.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
YUDY HERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case highlights the significant legal exposure for online businesses, particularly those in the e-commerce sector, that have websites inaccessible to disabled users. Failure to address WCAG violations, especially concerning interactive elements, form submissions, and overall site navigation, can lead to ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and damages.