Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Cannabis Retailer and Medical Office Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 27, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

WCAG 2.2 AAMissing Alt TextSemantic Markup IssuesIncorrect Reading OrderMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

Nicholas Pagan has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on January 27, 2025, against an online cannabis retailer with physical medical office locations. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the defendant's website is inaccessible, creating digital barriers that violate Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint specifically alleges multiple WCAG violations, including the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure non-visually, an inability to programmatically determine correct reading sequence, missing web page titles, and images not explained for screen reader users. Additionally, the lawsuit claims that the defendant lacks an adequate accessibility policy for its digital presence, deterring the plaintiff from fully accessing goods and services.

This legal action underscores the critical need for businesses, especially those with integrated online and physical operations, to ensure their websites are fully compliant with WCAG 2.2 AA guidelines. Similar online retailers and medical office chains risk legal challenges and costly injunctive relief if their digital platforms fail to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online cannabis retailer accused of?

The online cannabis retailer is accused of missing text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey content meaning and structure non-visually, incorrect reading sequence determination, missing web page titles, unexplained images for screen readers, and an inadequate accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nicholas Pagan filed this lawsuit, and is represented by Alberto R. Leal, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses operating websites that are not fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III and WCAG 2.2 AA, particularly regarding screen reader compatibility, semantic structure, and clear accessibility policies, potentially leading to injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Cannabis Retailer .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer