Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 28, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level AWCAG 2.1 Level AAKeyboard TrapFocus Order IssuesScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online luxury apparel and accessories retailer. The complaint was lodged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 28, 2025, alleging that the e-commerce website's barriers deny blind and visually disabled individuals equal access.

The complaint specifically details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include a "No Keyboard Trap" (2.1.2) issue where tab focus becomes stuck in expanded submenus, multiple "Focus Order" (2.4.3) problems with unannounced or unfocused pop-ups (promotional, 'Fit Quiz', and email entry), and confusing focus shifts in product detail sections. Furthermore, "Name, Role, Value" (4.1.2) violations are cited due to incorrectly labeled color options and a wishlist link that loses its descriptive label, alongside a "Status Messages" (4.1.3) issue for the lack of verbal notification when a product is added to a wishlist.

This legal action highlights the ongoing vulnerability of businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites with physical store locations, to ADA Title III litigation if their digital platforms fail to meet accessibility standards. The lawsuit underscores the importance for similar online retailers to conduct thorough audits and implement necessary modifications to ensure full and equal access for all users, thereby mitigating risks of declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as liability for attorney's fees and litigation expenses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

This luxury apparel and accessories retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including keyboard traps, incorrect focus order for pop-ups and product details, issues with named, roles, and values for color options and wishlist links, and unannounced status messages.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for e-commerce websites that fail to ensure full accessibility for visually disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III and demands for website modifications, legal fees, and ongoing accessibility audits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury apparel and acce.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer