ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online restaurant and chophouse
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 28, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that a restaurant and chophouse's website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to provide full and equal access to individuals with visual disabilities.
The complaint details several WCAG violations, including a telephone number lacking a full description, unlabeled links, screen reader stating "asterisk" instead of "required" in text boxes, and inaccessible PDF menus. These barriers prevent visually impaired users from effectively navigating and utilizing the online services, such as checking hours, purchasing food/gift cards, and making reservations.
This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating public accommodation websites that do not adhere to ADA accessibility standards. Companies are expected to provide auxiliary aids and services, such as screen reader compatibility, to ensure effective communication and equal access for all users, including those with visual disabilities, thereby avoiding potential litigation for discrimination.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant and chophouse accused of?
The online restaurant and chophouse is accused of having a telephone number without a full description, unlabeled links, screen reader misinterpreting required text box fields as "asterisk," and menus in an inaccessible PDF format.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
What legal risk does this create?
This creates legal risk for similar businesses if their websites fail to comply with ADA Title III accessibility requirements, potentially leading to lawsuits for unlawful disability discrimination and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees to remedy ongoing access barriers.