Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 14, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ESQ. P.Α.

WCAG 2.2 Level AAMissing/Similar Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureHeading Structure IssuesForm Field Labeling Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff ANDREE CAMPBELL, represented by ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ESQ. P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online jewelry retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 14, 2025. The plaintiff, who is blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers that prevent visually disabled individuals from fully and equally accessing its content and services, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations, including similar alternative text for different product images, an improperly defined heading hierarchy with missing heading levels, interactive elements not focusable by keyboard, inaccessible sub-menu elements, form expirations without control mechanisms, a lack of focus shift to the mini cart dialog upon adding products, repeated tabbing through identical elements, issues with keyboard focus after page reloads, ambiguous form field labels, an absence of value announcement after adding items to the cart, and missing status updates for both search suggestions and search results. These barriers reportedly caused frustration and prevented the plaintiff from completing a purchase.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for all online businesses, particularly those operating with physical stores, that fail to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.2 Level AA guidelines or higher. The lawsuit highlights that websites serving as extensions of public accommodations must be fully accessible, and non-compliance can lead to litigation, substantial legal costs, and denial of full participation in goods, services, and privileges for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

The complaint alleges similar alternative text for product images, an improperly defined heading hierarchy, interactive elements not focusable via keyboard, inaccessible sub-menu elements, form expirations without control mechanisms, lack of focus shift to mini cart dialogs, repeated tabbing through identical elements, issues with keyboard focus after page reloads, ambiguous form field labels, no announcement of item value after adding to cart, and missing status updates for search suggestions and results.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff ANDREE CAMPBELL, represented by ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online businesses that fail to make their websites accessible to individuals with disabilities, especially those with brick-and-mortar stores. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can result in lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and mandatory accessibility updates and policies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer