Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Sushi Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 20, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.1 A Keyboard AccessibilityWCAG 2.1 A Focus OrderWCAG 2.1 A Name Role ValueScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA has filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on March 20, 2025, against an online sushi restaurant chain. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals using screen reader software, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifies several WCAG violations, including Level A Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to an unreadable sushi guide with colored dots, Level A Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) for menu content that cannot be accurately read by screen readers, Level A Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) because an inaccessible delivery date picker prevents keyboard navigation, Level A Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) alleging illogical keyboard focus shifts on menu categories and a skipped "Add Another eGift Card" button, and Level A Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) citing unlabeled "pause" and "play" buttons on the homepage video without alternative descriptions.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites and digital platforms that fail to provide full and equal access to visually disabled individuals. Such inaccessibility can lead to ADA Title III litigation, emphasizing the critical need for all online services to comply with web accessibility standards to avoid discriminatory practices and potential legal liabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online sushi restaurant chain accused of?

The restaurant's website is accused of Level A Guideline 1.3.1 (unreadable sushi guide with colored dots), Level A Guideline 1.3.2 (unreadable menu content), Level A Guideline 2.1.1 (inaccessible date picker by keyboard), Level A Guideline 2.4.3 (illogical keyboard focus shifts and skipped buttons), and Level A Guideline 4.1.2 (unlabeled video controls and missing descriptions).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

, and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure faced by digital platforms that do not adhere to web accessibility standards, underscoring the necessity for businesses to ensure their online services are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to avoid ADA Title III lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Sushi Restaurant C.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer